The official Church version is that Mary Magdalene was buried in Ephesus and that in 899 the Emperor Leo VI had her relics transferred to a monastery in Constantinople.
This has the effect of keeping Mary Magdalene well away from Western Europe and any theories about the Sangreal, the bloodline of Jesus. But a strong contender in the burial probability stakes comes from Provence in France, where there is, as mentioned before, what amounts to a ‘Mary Magdalene industry’.
It was Gregory of Tours, chronicler of the Frankish kings in the late 6th century, who recorded the older tradition that Mary Magdalene died in Ephesus where she had lived for many years with Jesus’s mother, Mary, and John the Evangelist, thought to have been the author of the Fourth Gospel, the Gospel of John.
This account was, however, contradicted in a document in Latin (c. 5th to 6th century) which, referring to an earlier record, claimed that Mary Magdalene had travelled to Aix-le-Provence with Saint Maximin and had lived there for many years before she died in Aix at the age of 60.
In keeping with the mission of Jesus entrusted to Mary Magdalene and the apostles, she and Maximin had preached the gospel in Gaul, and Maximin had become the first Christian bishop in Gaul (usually referred to as Bishop Maximus). He placed her embalmed body in a crypt and had a Basilica built over it to honour and protect it.
The body was said to have been removed during the Saracen invasions as it was feared it would be discovered and destroyed. Rumour has it that part of the remains were taken to the French monastery of Vezelay in Burgundy, the church of which carried Mary Magdalene’s name.
Years later, a monk of the Vezelay monastery is reputed to have found a crypt at the Basilica of St Maximin’s in Provence. Reference to the Magdalene was chiselled into the stone.
Margaret Starbird draws attention to a published report that the Vatican sent an Apostolic Nuncio with six bishops and several priests to celebrate mass at the Basilica of Marie Madeleine in 1950 to honour the 700-year Jubilee of the discovery of her grave in Provence. She asks questions we would all like to have answered. What did the Catholic Church know about Mary Magdalene to induce them to participate in this event? How long had the Church Fathers known whatever it was that they seemed to know? And, since they were willing to lend support to the Jubilee, why were they at the same time continuing to discount the stories that placed Mary Magdalene in Provence both during her lifetime and after her death?
Certain documents favouring the Constantinople (Byzantium) account of Mary Magdalene’s burial place claim that part of her relics were transferred in the 9th century to the monastery Church of St Lazarus and that, some time after the final Crusade, were moved to Italy where they were buried beneath the altar of the Lateran Cathedral in Rome. Other documentation places part of her relics near Marseilles where, as mentioned, the splendid St Maximum’s Basilica was built over them.
Then there is the contention that Mary Magdalene’s remains were buried, along with secret documents, on Temple Mount in Jerusalem and were found when the city was conquered during the First Crusade.
Where, then, is Mary Magdalene buried? Legends, rumours and traditions – both oral and written – abound. Again, the only honest answer is: we don’t know.
– Is she buried in Ephesus in Turkey, as the Church believes… or does it?
– Was she buried on Temple Mount in Jerusalem, and were her remains moved to the West when the crusaders took Jerusalem?
– Is she buried under the Basilica of St Maximin?
– Are some of her bones hidden in a crypt at Vezelay?
– Or are her relics buried in more than one place?
Finally, could it really be that her bones are buried within the glass pyramid at the Louvre Museum? Of all possibilities, this is surely the most unlikely.
It would be understandable had some of her bones been placed in different burial places after her initial burial in order to ensure that at least some of them survived being discovered and removed and perhaps even destroyed.
Perhaps this mystery will also be solved in due course if contemporary documents are ever discovered.
Powered by Qumana






How on earth did the Baigent-Lee plagiarism suit against Dan Brown fail? It is totally obvious to anyone who has read both books that dan Brown lifted his plot wholesale from, “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail”. What was wrong with that judge?
what on earth is wrong with the guy writing a book about all this
as a story he is entitled to do so and he is quite aknowledging of the fact that all these ideas are not of his own invention
its a really interesting story just enjoy it
he didnt lift his plot at all from anyone else he just wrote a story based on a lot of conspirancy theory and romantic ideas all rolled into one
the film and book ask good questions about religion and those that would protect their belief in the light of evidence to the contrary
its a great book ad a great film
mary certainly exisited as much as jesus did and its very likely that they had the the kind of relationship indicated by many texts
we may ever know where she is buried or if there is a real sophie (no pun intended)
but the holy blood holy grail book is not the first or last book on the subject and im reliably informed sales of th e book have rocketed since the DVC so antyclaims against dan brown are cynical and quite ridiculous and based on one simple incentive money
i enjoyed the book and the movie. i feel there is a lot of truth in it and the truth has to come out one day. christians deserve it, as they sacrilieged the hindu and greek empire. they must endure the curse.and high time they stopped using jesus as a toy to mint money.
I enjoyed the book. Do I believe it? Some of it, Most it is kinda far fetch. What it did was send me to do some research on my own. I learn a lot. It did not in any way taint my thought, maybe stirred it. It also reinforce the fact that history tends to be more subjective (than objective) to what it is that we are left to observe/examine and the real true is not always something we are privy to. I never really liked History in High School.
i’m a hindu.most of our gods are married & have children.what’s wrong if Jesus is married?
i guess that we will just find out about this when jesus comes once again!
this is quite a strange and odd news.But what i did know is that when Jesus comes he will marry……………..
i read the book ans saw the movie and part of me wants to know where mary is buried and if she was really pregnant with jesus’s child and the other part says i dont want to know because i love the whole idea of the mystery… but mostly i just enjoyed the book and i thought it was incredibly written but thats just my opinion
The book if nothing else has served to make God’s creation take a step back and think …. About time something did …. And does it matter really if Jesus was married or kissed a girl or knew the blessing of being a husband or the hope of being a father? Or is he only suppose to know the pains of humanity? I don’t know if there is a bloodline but i do know i’d be happier knowing the Lord knew the love of being a husband and father. It changes nothing … Not his message …. Not his sacrifice … Just makes him human and according to the bible blessed by GOD!!!